<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stronico - Steroids for Networking &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stronico.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stronico.com</link>
	<description>Building the Address Book that Works With Your Brain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to Fix: Canonical Urls with IIS 7&#8217;s Url Rewrite feature for https</title>
		<link>http://blog.stronico.com/2010/06/how-to-fix-canonical-urls-with-iis-7s-url-rewrite-feature-for-https/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.stronico.com/2010/06/how-to-fix-canonical-urls-with-iis-7s-url-rewrite-feature-for-https/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASP.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.net MVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stronico.com/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a title="SATOR Magic square" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/45035549@N00/287007410/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" style="border: 0px initial initial;" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/119/287007410_3520a789d7_m.jpg" border="0" alt="SATOR Magic square" width="240" height="240" /></a><strong>The Problem:</strong> You want to make your website all SEO friendly by creating a single, canonical url.  For example, if someone types in <a href="http://stronico.com" target="_blank">http://www.stronico.com</a>, you want them to be redirected to <a href="http://stronico.com" target="_blank">http://stronico.com</a> (Google likes it this way).  You do some research and discover that all of the default code and documentation for handling canonical Urls in IIS 7 uses web.config files and the URL Rewrite application program.  All is well and good so far, but what if you use SSL?  The stock code will always redirect you to <a href="https://stronico.com" target="_blank">http://stronico.com/Signup/</a> even if the original url was <a href="https://stronico.com">https://stronico.com/Signup/</a> (note the https).<span id="more-462"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://blog.stronico.com/2010/06/how-to-fix-canonical-urls-with-iis-7s-url-rewrite-feature-for-https/" class="more-link">Read more on How to Fix: Canonical Urls with IIS 7&#8217;s Url Rewrite feature for https&#8230;</a></p>
<img src="http://blog.stronico.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&#038;id=462&#038;type=feed" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="SATOR Magic square" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/45035549@N00/287007410/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" style="border: 0px initial initial;" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/119/287007410_3520a789d7_m.jpg" border="0" alt="SATOR Magic square" width="240" height="240" /></a><strong>The Problem:</strong> You want to make your website all SEO friendly by creating a single, canonical url.  For example, if someone types in <a href="http://stronico.com" target="_blank">http://www.stronico.com</a>, you want them to be redirected to <a href="http://stronico.com" target="_blank">http://stronico.com</a> (Google likes it this way).  You do some research and discover that all of the default code and documentation for handling canonical Urls in IIS 7 uses web.config files and the URL Rewrite application program.  All is well and good so far, but what if you use SSL?  The stock code will always redirect you to <a href="https://stronico.com" target="_blank">http://stronico.com/Signup/</a> even if the original url was <a href="https://stronico.com">https://stronico.com/Signup/</a> (note the https).<span id="more-462"></span></p>
<p><strong>The Cause:</strong> URL Rewrite is new, and it was an oversight on Microsoft&#8217;s part.</p>
<p><strong>The Solution:</strong> You have to use two rules, first checking to see if the url contains the https.  Here is a sample below</p>
<blockquote><p>&lt;rewrite&gt;<br />
&lt;rules&gt;<br />
&lt;rule name=&#8221;Canonical Hostname &#8211; No HTTPS&#8221;&gt;<br />
&lt;match url=&#8221;(.*)&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;conditions logicalGrouping=&#8221;MatchAll&#8221; trackAllCaptures=&#8221;false&#8221;&gt;<br />
&lt;add input=&#8221;{HTTPS}&#8221; pattern=&#8221;OFF&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;add input=&#8221;{HTTP_HOST}&#8221; pattern=&#8221;^stronico\.com$&#8221; negate=&#8221;true&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;/conditions&gt;<br />
&lt;action type=&#8221;Redirect&#8221; url=&#8221;http://stronico.com/{R:1}&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;/rule&gt;<br />
&lt;rule name=&#8221;Canonical Hostname &#8211; With HTTPS&#8221;&gt;<br />
&lt;match url=&#8221;(.*)&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;conditions logicalGrouping=&#8221;MatchAll&#8221; trackAllCaptures=&#8221;false&#8221;&gt;<br />
&lt;add input=&#8221;{HTTPS}&#8221; pattern=&#8221;ON&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;add input=&#8221;{HTTP_HOST}&#8221; pattern=&#8221;^stronico\.com$&#8221; negate=&#8221;true&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;/conditions&gt;<br />
&lt;action type=&#8221;Redirect&#8221; url=&#8221;https://stronico.com/{R:1}&#8221; /&gt;<br />
&lt;/rule&gt;<br />
&lt;/rules&gt;<br />
&lt;/rewrite&gt;</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s it!  It took me an embarassingly long time to figure that one out.<br />
<small><a title="Attribution License" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank"><img src="http://blog.stronico.com/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" border="0" alt="Creative Commons License" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a title="Marco Fedele" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/45035549@N00/287007410/" target="_blank">Marco Fedele</a></small></p>
<img src="http://blog.stronico.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=462&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.stronico.com/2010/06/how-to-fix-canonical-urls-with-iis-7s-url-rewrite-feature-for-https/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to fix Blogger page title problems</title>
		<link>http://blog.stronico.com/2009/11/how-to-fix-blogger-page-title-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.stronico.com/2009/11/how-to-fix-blogger-page-title-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d841862.test42.slangdatabase.com/2009/11/how-to-fix-blogger-page-title-problems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was perusing my Google Analytics reports and did some checking on came across some sub optimal page structure. </p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Problem:</span> Blogger (my blogging platform of choice) sets page titles in reverse.  More specifically Blogger will set the title of a post as &#8220;Stronico Contact Management &#8211; How to fix browser size problem in Silverlight&#8221; &#8211; which is not as SEO friendly as what I thought it did, which would be &#8220;How to fix browser size problem in Silverlight &#8211; Stronico&#8221;.  The former has more words, and quite repetitive.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Cause:</span> Blogger is just set up that way</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Solution:</span> I did some Google work and <a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/002380.shtml">came across this post on SEO Book</a> (Thanks!)  Basically Blogger has a set of server tags it uses when publishing a blog to an outside server.   For whatever reason Blogger sets the page title in an odd order.  To fix the problem add in this code in the header section of the Blogger Template </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.stronico.com/2009/11/how-to-fix-blogger-page-title-problems/" class="more-link">Read more on How to fix Blogger page title problems&#8230;</a></p>
<img src="http://blog.stronico.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&#038;id=30&#038;type=feed" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was perusing my Google Analytics reports and did some checking on came across some sub optimal page structure. </p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Problem:</span> Blogger (my blogging platform of choice) sets page titles in reverse.  More specifically Blogger will set the title of a post as &#8220;Stronico Contact Management &#8211; How to fix browser size problem in Silverlight&#8221; &#8211; which is not as SEO friendly as what I thought it did, which would be &#8220;How to fix browser size problem in Silverlight &#8211; Stronico&#8221;.  The former has more words, and quite repetitive.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Cause:</span> Blogger is just set up that way</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Solution:</span> I did some Google work and <a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/002380.shtml">came across this post on SEO Book</a> (Thanks!)  Basically Blogger has a set of server tags it uses when publishing a blog to an outside server.   For whatever reason Blogger sets the page title in an odd order.  To fix the problem add in this code in the header section of the Blogger Template<br />
<blockquote>&lt;MainPage&gt;<br />&lt;title&gt;Stronico Blog &#8211; Visual Contact Management&lt;/title&gt;<br />&lt;/MainPage&gt;<br />&lt;Blogger&gt;<br />&lt;ArchivePage&gt;<br />&lt;title&gt;Archive of the Stronico Blog&lt;/title&gt;<br />&lt;/ArchivePage&gt;<br />&lt;ItemPage&gt;<br />&lt;BlogItemTitle&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;$BlogItemTitle$&gt; : Stronico&lt;/title&gt;&lt;/BlogItemTitle&gt;&lt;/ItemPage&gt;<br />&lt;/Blogger&gt;</p></blockquote>
<p>That will do it!  Thank you SEO Book!</p>
<img src="http://blog.stronico.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=30&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.stronico.com/2009/11/how-to-fix-blogger-page-title-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Tip &#8211; Set your domain to expire in several years</title>
		<link>http://blog.stronico.com/2009/10/seo-tip-set-your-domain-to-expire-in-several-years/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.stronico.com/2009/10/seo-tip-set-your-domain-to-expire-in-several-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://d841862.test42.slangdatabase.com/2009/10/seo-tip-set-your-domain-to-expire-in-several-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was recently looking into more Search Engine Optimization techniques and came across several experts (such as they are) saying that Google ranks sites with domain names that expire in a year or less lower than sites who&#8217;s domain names expire after that.  While that doesn&#8217;t seem very fair, it does make sense.  Many PR and spam sites aren&#8217;t intended to last for long, and a distant expiration date does signal that the site is meant to be around for a long while.</p>
<p>On that note, I just renewed Stronico for another three years.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.stronico.com/2009/10/seo-tip-set-your-domain-to-expire-in-several-years/" class="more-link">Read more on SEO Tip &#8211; Set your domain to expire in several years&#8230;</a></p>
<img src="http://blog.stronico.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&#038;id=25&#038;type=feed" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently looking into more Search Engine Optimization techniques and came across several experts (such as they are) saying that Google ranks sites with domain names that expire in a year or less lower than sites who&#8217;s domain names expire after that.  While that doesn&#8217;t seem very fair, it does make sense.  Many PR and spam sites aren&#8217;t intended to last for long, and a distant expiration date does signal that the site is meant to be around for a long while.</p>
<p>On that note, I just renewed Stronico for another three years.</p>
<img src="http://blog.stronico.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=25&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.stronico.com/2009/10/seo-tip-set-your-domain-to-expire-in-several-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
